All categories

2 years ago

Deli ham was on sale for $3.29 per pound. Maria's order weighed 1.2 pounds. To the nearest penny, what will Maria’s ham cost?

Mathematics

1 answer:

mote1985 [20]2 years ago

7 0

Her ham would cost $3.95
3.29*1.2=3.948, round it up to 3.95

You might be interested in

Can someone please help me with this

PtichkaEL [24]

1. 40m^2 2.150ft^2 3.99in^2 4.70m^2

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Convert the following <br><br>250cm to m

dmitriy555 [2]

100 cm = 1m

1 cm = 1/100

250 cm = 1/100*250

= 2.5m

This is Right answer...

4 0

2 years ago

(03.05 LC) The graph of a function f(x) is shown below: graph of line segment going through ordered pairs negative 3, negative 4

Aleks [24]

Answer:

−3 < x ≤ 1

Step-by-step explanation:

The domain of a function is the set of x-values.

In this graph, the open circle at (-3, -4) means the segment goes back up to this point but this point is not part of the segment itself.

The closed circle at (1, 2) means this is the endpoint and part of the segment.

This means the x-values range from almost -3 up to and including 1; this gives us the inequality

−3 < x ≤ 1

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I need help with 18, 19, & 20

luda_lava [24]

18. 17.9
19. 21.1
20. I cant see the numbers sorry; if the sides are 6, √85 than it should have an angle of 40.6

4 0

3 years ago

According to the US Bureau of labor statistics, 7% of US female workers between 16 and 24 years old are paid at the minimum wage

vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Decision rule

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

Conclusion

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The percentage of US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is $k_o =$ 7% = 0.07

The sample size is $n = 500$

The number paid minimum wage or less is x = 42

The significance level is $\alpha =$ 5% = 0.05

Now the probability of getting a US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is mathematically represented as

$\= k = \frac{x}{n}$

substituting value

$\= k = \frac{42}{500}$

$\= k = 0.084$

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as

$z = \frac{\= k - k_o}{\sqrt{\frac{k_o(1-k_o)}{n} } }$

substituting value

$z = \frac{0.084 - 0.07}{\sqrt{\frac{0.07 (1-0.07)}{500} } }$

$z = 1.23$

Now the Decision rule is stated as

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

So the conclusion will be

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

4 0

3 years ago