The answer & explanation for this question is given in the attachment below.
Answer:
$328,000
Explanation:
As we all know that:
Ending Equity = Opening Equity + Share Issues + Net Income – Net Loss – Dividends Paid
Here,
Opening Equity is $293,000
Money raised through Shares Issuance was $24,000
Net Income would be $69,000
Dividends paid were $58,000
There were no losses as their is Profit for the year (Net Income).
By putting values, we have:
Ending Equity = $293,000 + $24,000 + $69,000 - $58,000
= $328,000
Answer:
$117,600
Explanation:
Boxes of Frosted Flakes ×Estimate of Box Tops to be redeemed
1,344,000×60%= 806,000
806,000- 630,000 (Box Tops redeemed) =176,400
Estimate of Box Tops left to be received /Number of Box Tops Needed per bowl
176,400/3= 58,800 Total bowls estimated to be sent to customers in future
58,800 x 2.00 (The Cost of bowls to company was $3 while the cash to be received from customer was $1)
= $117,600 Which will be the total premium liability to be recorded.
Answer:
$21,435.74
Explanation:
Marko will pay as much as the discounted present value of the cash flow:
Maturity $5,000.00
time 1.00
rate 0.14000
PV 4,385.9649
Maturity $9,000.00
time 2.00
rate 0.14000
PV 6,925.2078
Maturity $15,000.00
time 3.00
rate 0.14000
PV 10,124.5727
We add them together and get the total price for ABC Co
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}#&Cashflow&Discounted\\&&\\1&5000&4385.96\\2&9000&6925.21\\3&15000&10124.57\\&total&21435.74\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%23%26Cashflow%26Discounted%5C%5C%26%26%5C%5C1%265000%264385.96%5C%5C2%269000%266925.21%5C%5C3%2615000%2610124.57%5C%5C%26total%2621435.74%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Answer: condition subsequent
Explanation: A condition subsequent is an incident or set of circumstances that bring something to a conclusion. A subsequent circumstance is being used as a symbol in a legal sense to put an end of one's constitutional rights or responsibilities.
This generally occurs when someone do anything illegal or unethical in the eyes of law. In the given case, Franco got employed by some other party although he had a contract with James that he cannot do that. Hence we can conclude that the given case depicts condition subsequent.
