Answer:
do you watch riverdale?
pls dont report me im jus bored -_-
Explanation:
Based on efficiency, the businesses that should cut hair are the A and C; moreover, to meet the demand, each firm will need to offer at least two haircuts.
The supply of a product or the units of a product that is offered to potential customers should always meet the number of real customers. In the same way, the price of the product should meet the price customers are willing to pay.
In this context, the best is that only firm A and C cut hair, this is because their prices per cut ($25 and $30) match the consumers' willingness to pay this includes Lorenzo ($35), Gilberto ($50), Juanita ($40) and Neha ($25).
- Firm A can cut Neha's and Lorenzo's hair
- Firm C can cut Gilberto's and Juanita's hair
Moreover, this implies each firm needs to do at least 2 haircuts to cover all the possible customers.
In the case of firms B and D, the price per cut is high ($40 - $45). Based on this, they should not cut hair as only a few customers can pay for this service, and this would be inefficient.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/13225200
Answer: 35.29%
Explanation:
Municipal Bonds are attractive in that they give the tax benefit of being tax exempt whereas a corporate bond is liable for taxation. The tax rate that will therefore make an investor indifferent between the two bonds is the one that will equate the Corporate bond's yield net of tax to the yield on the Municipal bond.
5.5% = 8.5% * ( 1 - x)
5.5% = 8.5% - 0.085x
0.085x = 8.5% - 5.5%
0.085x = 3%
x = 35.29%
You get kind of a credit every time you buy something from the card issuer. that means you borrow money for the purchase you make from the card issuer with the promise to pay them at the end of the month (or whenever your contract tells you to). it's easy to switch credit cards and there are a lot of free contracts out there. better give your credit card number to someone you don't trust than your bank account number. cause in case of a fraud you can just change credit card. changing the bank account is a lot harder than changing credit card (plus the card issuer has the problem of not getting their money. not you)
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
