The best way to illustrate the relative frequency distribution is a percentage or a proportion.
For example, imagine that in the survey conducted above 80 people where interviewed and 35 were democrat, 24 republican, 12 libertarian, and 9 chose another party.
- Absolut frequencies would be the number of responses for each option: 35, 24, 12 and 9.
- Relative frequency (democrats) = 35/80 = 0.4375= 43,75 % of the participants
- Relative frequency (republicans)= 24/80= 0.3 = 30% of the participants
- Relative frequency (libertarians)= 12/80= 0.15 = 15% of the participants
- Relative frequency (others)= 9/80= 0.1125 = 11,25 % of the participants
I believe, yes it is.
Ideally, the role of the government is not to babysit the individuals so they can have a decent living without actually making an effort. But, the government need to play a role to ensure that the competition among the citizens happen as fairly as possible, and protect the citizens from any form of internal and external threats.
Answer:
The biggest difference is in their locations.
Explanation:
<em>Suburbs</em> are places to live just outside of the city and the city can be easily accessible. It means that people living in the suburbs can enjoy the city's life if they want to: they still have to have a car or other means of transport to get to the city but the distance is not too great. They can easily go to the movies or to a particular restaurant and return home for the night. Most commuting workers live in the suburbs and so do families with small children who seek a peaceful area for their children to grow in.
<em>Exurbs </em>are located farther from the city, often in rural areas or in coastal resorts. They are suitable for people who look for complete privacy and who do not need to be in the city every day. They may be retired people or people who work from home. Exurbs are also used as a place for a second residence.
Answer:
<u>The first step would have been to avoid war with Japan during the Russo-Japanese War 1904-1905. This war cost the Russians two Battleship Fleets and caused the Battleship Potemkin to mutiny in 1905 (Russian Battleship Potemkin was from the only remaining Russian Fleet stationed in the Black Sea); Japanese intelligence staff also financed some of the Bolshevik covert operations which were undermining the Tsar (whom Japan was at war with); including the financing of Lenin himself. Had the Russo-Japanese War not occurred. Russia would have at least survived past WW1. As history records, Tsarist Russia fell in 1917, one year before the end of WW1, which was 1918. The Tsar could have given his people more food and listen to them. He could have gotten out of WW1 earlier. At the same time he could have given more power to the duma.</u>
Explanation:
Because of his inaptitude and inadequate decisions and inability to change with the times he paved the path for revolution. This revolution in 1917 led to the end of his family's dynasty, the end of the autocracy in Russia. Who Was Nicholas II? Nicholas II inherited the throne when his father, Alexander III, died in 1894. Although he believed in an autocracy, he was eventually forced to create an elected legislature. Nicholas II's handling of Bloody Sunday and World War I incensed his subjects and led to his abdication. In March 1917, the army garrison at Petrograd joined striking workers in demanding socialist reforms, and Czar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate. In July 1918, the advance of counterrevolutionary forces caused the Yekaterinburg Soviet forces to fear that Nicholas might be rescued. Lenin saw an opportunity to seize power for himself and took it. He returned to Petrograd and convened a meeting of his party on October 10. Lenin then forced through a decision (by 10 votes to 2) to prepare an uprising. According to the official state version of the USSR, former Tsar Nicholas Romanov, along with members of his family and retinue, was executed by firing squad, by order of the Ural Regional Soviet, due to the threat of the city being occupied by Whites (Czechoslovak Legion).
