Answer:
they work hard and dedication
Explanation:
Answer:
Materials
62,000 equivalent units
Conversion
42,800 Equivalent untis
Cost of finished Goods
38,000 x (.75 + .55) = 38,000 x 1.3 = $49,400
WIP
24,000 x .75 = 18,000
4,800 x .55 = 2,640
Total WIP 20,640
Explanation:
Equivalent Units
38,000 complete
20% of 24,000 WIP = 4,800
Equivalent Units CC = 42,800
x .55 CC = 23540
Materials
62,000 x .75 = $46,500
It excludes money paid as salaries or wages to employees.
Answer:
Project manager
Explanation:
Glenda must be working as a<u> project manager</u>.
<em>A project manager is a person that leads the team to design and execute projects within an establishment. He/she also ensures monitoring and control of resources in order to get maximum results. </em>
Hence, Glenda must have been employed as a project manager for the telecommunication company.
Original Source Material
Student Version
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Several factors can contribute to long-term organizational success. One is the establishment of a core ideology that Collins and Porras (2002) describe as "core values and sense of purpose beyond just making money" (p. 48). Also, the importance of a visionary leader that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time is hard to over emphasize.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
This is not plagiarism.
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Plagiarism in very simple words is the copying of the content of the document that has been written by some one else in to your own document. During this copying the due acknowledgement is also not given to the document from which it has been taken.
The document that has been talked about in the question above is not an example of plagiarism. The proof for this is the due acknowledgement given to the references from whose document the content has been taken into the document.
