Answer:
<u>A Strategic Alliance</u>
Explanation:
A Strategic Alliance refers to a combined effort or activities of two firms so as to strengthen their market position and yet at the same time maintain their individual separate corporate existence.
It represents a mutually beneficial agreement between two corporate firms under which, terms are less binding and stringent than a joint venture.
The purpose behind such an alliance could be, expansion, product line improvement or together gain a competitive advantage.
Such an alliance helps both businesses achieve a common goal driven by mutual assistance and pooling of resources.
In the given case, the tie up between Caffery computer corp. and Chicago desktop to sell computer locking systems alongside computers, would be termed a strategic alliance, since such an arrangement would benefit both, reduce competition for each with collective gain w.r.t market share.
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
In a competitive market, all firms produce identical goods and services. No firm or seller can influence the prevailing market price. To increase their revenue, firms must increase their outputs.
In this industry, firms make economic profit(revenue minus accounting cost minus implicit cost) in the short run but this economic profit reduces to zero in the long run because more firms that are attracted by the short run profit can enter the industry freely. Firms can also exit with little or no cost.
The amount of cost of goods sold using FIFO method is $110,000.
Hope this helps. :)
Answer:
Yes the absolute privilege for communications made in judicial or other official proceedings apply to statements made when a citizen contracts the police to report suspected criminal activity
Explanation:
Absolute priviledge for communication is the provision that covers a person from legal action on grounds of defamation for statements made. Under certain circumstances a person can make defamatory statements and be immune from legal action.
In this scenario Lydia Harberg went to California Federal Bank to cash a check that was suspected to be fake.
Nolene Showalter contacted SB to confirm. Based on the information provided at that time, the check was confirmed to be fake. The implication was that a fraud was being perpetrated.
So his action of calling the police is justified. SB only verified they gave out wrong information the first time
Answer:
The answer is 2.5
Explanation:
Mpc = marginal propensity to consume
Mps = marginal propensity to save
Multiplier = 1/ 1-mpc= 1/ mps
Multiplier = 1/ 1-0.6 = 1/ 0.4 = 2.5
