Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Answer:
The Court's greatest power is judicial review, the power to strike down laws passed by federal and state legislatures, on the grounds that they violate basic principles in the Constitution.
Explanation:
Answer:
b. Communication is the transmission of information and meaning from one individual or group to another.
The homestead act allowed settlers from the west settle on land, only paying a small fee. but they must stay on their land for 5 years before getting the land. They were allowed to leave the land but must be present when the inspector comes to see how they are doing.
It first known when: <span>Prophets in all ages have foretold that latter-day Restoration of the gospel
Basically, almost every religion teach that at the end of the time, humans will be divided into those who are 'good' and those who are 'bad'. The promise of </span>latter-day Restoration is used by every religion to influence their believers that they need to keep doing the teachings of that religion because they can never know when will the restoration day come.
