Yes, I think that identifying the purpose would increase the credibility of the source, so if we understand the "should" here as "would be good if, is recommended" - then this statement is true.
Including the intent of the information in the source will help place the information in a wider context - and often the context is necessary to fully understand the content of a source.
A peer revision shouldn't be just written as a quick bullet point list. Peer revisions should be in the complete format, should be in sentences with all the necessary things in it. Well, if needed then you should construct it including your bullet points.
It is known as the Divergent thinking. Divergent Thinking is a manner of thinking or strategy used to produce imaginative thoughts by investigating numerous conceivable arrangements. It is frequently utilized as a part of conjunction with its psychological partner, concurrent considering, which takes after a specific arrangement of sensible strides to touch base at one arrangement, which now and again is a 'right' arrangement.
Answer:
I enjoyed how I was able to actually see how the foundations of the US government came from people who weren't perfect. The musical doesn't try to show them in a perfect light where they are all saints who are to be praised at all times. No, it shows that they made mistakes and that this government was created with perfection, but it has allowed so many people to influence the world we live in today.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Social".
Explanation:
- Research at social trends seems to be the analysis of business-impacting human behavior, a better quality of life.
- The growing number of social media networks on the Web is due to rise throughout the number of people choosing to communicate digitally with each other.
Therefore, Social is the right answer.
