A cosmograph simply because that is not what any of the other graphs look like. D is the only one that can take the shape of a state.
Answer:
The answer is "2.45%".
Explanation:
The answer of option c:
Reduce power by 950 dollars:
In this question it will need to once again take the latest energy cost for analytical hierarchical productivity.
→ Total Input 
Consumer rates 
Initial efficiency multi-factor= 0.0245
Answer: True
Explanation:
When a project manager is confronted with resource overload, an activity that is not on the critical path can be delayed in order not to unnecessarily delay the project. The non-critcal activities can be delayed than an amount no longer than the slack period. This levels demand for that worker.
Answer:
There are three stages of assignment of costs to each product and these are as under:
- Allocation
- Apportionment
- Absorption / Activity Based costing
So this question relates to stage one. Suppose the following situation:
There are 2 departments and they have following expenses
Department A has a supervisor whose annual salary is $30000
Department B has a worker whose annual salary is $22000
Department A & B have shared a rented property for there operations.
Department A and B also shares electricity bills and annual electricity charges stand almost $80,000
Now the directly attributable / traceable cost to Department A are those that are hundred percent related to Department A. In this example, we saw that supervisor salary is the only cost that is hundred percent related to Department A. Likewise Worker's salary is also relateable to Department B. Whereas the rental cost and electricity bills are not directly attributable to these departments. So this means the manufacturing costs that are directly traceable are those that hundred percent relates to the manufacturing departments.
Answer:
this case tells us about some sort of pressures that accounts feel when financial statements are needed urgently
Explanation:
1) As for using low estimates, this step was wrong on her part. she should have been upfront in her estimates. for the items that she could not estimate there should have been an indication that such items were still under review, instead of doing what she did to give the financial estimate a good look. Using guesses or deliberately using low estimates was a bad idea, GAAP would never condone that.
She should have met with the president and let him know that finalization of the financial statements would not possible within the time frame that he has given. She could have also explain that such delays are normal and she would have given estimates of when the draft internal copy would be made available to him. such steps she took could have resulted in serious consequences for the company
2) I would not inflate or deflate the figures on purpose to make financial statements look better. If it is time to present the draft and final year-end financial statements I will have to tell the truth on the numbers and estimations used and also the reasons for that. i would have explained the constraints that i was facing. if i was still being pressurized by the president, i would have no choice than to call it quits instead of going against the ethics of my profession, since there are both ethical and legal implications to not giving inaccurate financial statements.
