Answer:
b. $1,144 unfavourable.
Explanation:
The computation of the variable overhead efficiency variance is shown below:
= (Actual Hours - Standard Hours) × Standard rate per hour
=(1,700 - 8.1 × 200 units) × $14.30
= 80 × $14.30
= $1,144 unfavorable
hence, the variable overhead efficiency variance is $1,144 unfavorable
Therefore the option b is correct
Answer:
Equilibrium quantity will increase; Equilibrium price is ambiguous.
Explanation:
If the government removes a tax on the production of beer then as a result the producers of beer will increase their production level and this will increase the supply of beer in an economy. Therefore, there is a rightward shift in the supply curve of beer.
Simultaneously, the students are ready to party in the new quarter which indicates that the demand for beer increases. This will shift the demand curve for beer rightwards.
As a result of these shift in the demand curve and in the supply curve of beer, the equilibrium quantity of beer increases and the effect on equilibrium price of beer is ambiguous because that will be dependent upon the magnitude of the shift in the demand and supply curve.
Answer:
% in T bills = 18.92%, % in P = 81.08%
Explanation:
Portfolio return = Weighted average return
Return of portfolio P = 0.14*0.6 + 0.10*0.4
Return of portfolio P = 0.124
Let % money in T bills be x
0.11 = 0.05*x + 0.124*(1-x)
0.11 = 0.05x + 0.124 - 0.124x
0.014 = 0.074x
x = 18.92%
Hence, % in T bills = 18.92%, % in P = 81.08%
Answer:
The Tamara Foundation has partnered with Stronger Philanthropy to manage the grant application process. Stronger Philanthropy will interview charities to determine their funding priorities, present Charity Profiles to the Tamara Foundation that are aligned with our mission and mandate for shortlisting, contact charities being invited to submit an application for consideration, and manage new grant applications and follow-up reports.
Explanation:
hope it helps
answerd by Hami Radcliffe
Answer: C. high returns
Explanation: Risk-return tradeoff is an investing theory which indicates that as higher the risk, the greater the return reward. In order to determine an acceptable risk-return tradeoff, investors need to weigh several aspects, including total risk exposure, the ability to substitute missing capital, and more.