Answer:
37.36%
Step-by-step explanation:
Each year it increases 1.6%.
So year 1 it increases (1+1.6%), year 2 increases (1+1.6%)^2 and so on...
so after 20 years, overall increase is found by 1.016^20 = 1.3736 or increase of 37.36%
please give thanks :)
Answer:
(c) H0 should be rejected
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis (H0): population mean is equal to 5
Alternate hypothesis (Ha): population mean is greater than 5
Z = (sample mean - population mean) ÷ (sd/√n)
sample mean = 5.3, population mean = 5, sd = 1, n = 500
Z = (5.3 - 5) ÷ (1/√500) = 0.3 ÷ 0.045 = 6.67
Using the normal distribution table, for a one tailed test at 0.01 significance level, the critical value is 2.326
Conclusion:
Since 6.67 is greater than 2.326, reject the null hypothesis (H0)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation: B. SSS because it shows us three sides ,C.RHS because it has a right angle, d. AAS because it shows us two sides and a non included side, e. RHS because it has a right angle, f. AAS because it has two angles and non included side.
So you have to find the relationship between the pumpkin diameter (y) and the number of weeks passed (x) in a table, lets do it taking into account that the equation modeling such behaviour is:
y = 2x + 6, where x is the number of weeks and plus original 6 cm
x y
week diameter
0 6
1 8
3 12
5 16
10 26
substitute the x and y values in the equation to see how they fit into it
