Clayton says that 2 1/2 + 3 3/5 will be more than 5 but less than 6 since 2 + 3 is 5. Is Clayton’s reasoning correct? Prove him
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
The answer is "Choice B".
Step-by-step explanation:
Please find the complete question in the attached file.
In this question, in all choices, the choice (B) is Correct because in the declaration of the statement Only when the process has had at least another answer could a candidate solution for more than just a linear model explicitly uses a parametric description that's why the given statement is true.
