Answer:
Foster Inc.'s assets will decrease by a net amount of $30,000.
The Company's liabilities will increase by $30,000.
Explanation:
The price of the assert is $5,000 + $30,000 = $35,000
this means that the company's fixed assets will increase by $35,000, but since cash is decreasing by $5,000, the net change will be only $30,000
the amount of the loan = $30,000
this means that the company's liabilities will increase by $30,000
Answer:
the adjustment for estimated uncollectible accounts will require
b. Debit to Bad Debt Expense for $10,000.
Explanation:
There are two primary methods for estimating bad-debt expense. The first is an income-statement approach that measures bad debt as a percentage of sales.
Accout receivable at the end_ 80000
Credit sales_______________400000
Estimate________________ 2,50%
Debit bas debt expense______10000
Answer:
The correct answer is C
Explanation:
Repositioning is states as altering or changing the position of the product in the customer minds as relative to the offerings of the product. It is very difficult as well as subtle procedure as the brand or the product needs or require to change the market understanding of the product.
In this case, the dairies would like to reposition the chocolate milk in the minds of the adult customers as they are trying to change the way adults think of chocolate milk.
Answer:
latter, latter
Explanation:
Property rights system determine how economic resources are used and owned by individuals, associations, collectives, or governments.
It also includes intellectual property such as inventions or ideas.
Such rights reduce destructive competition for control of economic resources. and replace this competition by peaceful means.
In a system where people are allowed to keep one-third of the monetary rewards of their labor with a system in which they keep two-thirds, we should expect more entrepreneurship under the <u>latter</u> system and faster real economic growth under the <u>latter</u> system.
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
