1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataly [62]
3 years ago
5

What is 0.7, 0.755, 5/8 from least to greatest?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Margarita [4]3 years ago
6 0
I like to start by turning all my numbers into the same form.  You can go either way but I am going to turn the decimals into fractions.  so 0.7 is the same as 7/10.

0.755 is like 755/1000 which can be reduced to 151/200  (if you don't understand the convertions let me know i will explaine more.)

Next give all the fractions a common denominator. both 8 and 10 go into 200 so we can use that.  151/200 already has a denominator of 200 so that one is set.
for 7/10  well, 10 time 20 is 200 so multiply both the numerator and the denominator by 20 so you get 140/200
the last one is 5/8  8 times 25 is 200 so multiply both numbers by 25 to get 125/200  

the fractionos we have are 125/200  151/200 and 140/200.  Now because they all have the same denominator the one with the lowest numerator is the least number and the one with the highest number is the greatest number.

125/200  140/200  151/200  now just replace the original number with the order they are placed in.
125/200 was 5/8
140/200 was 0.7 
151/200 was 0.755
so the final answer is 
5/8, 0.7, 0.755
You might be interested in
Write 60% as a
Setler79 [48]

Answer:

The answer is three fiths

7 0
3 years ago
In a random sample of 400 residents of Boston, 320 residents indicated that they voted for Obama in the last presidential electi
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

C.I =  0.7608   ≤ p ≤   0.8392

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Let consider a  random sample n = 400 candidates where  320 residents indicated that they voted for Obama

probability \hat p = \dfrac{320}{400}

= 0.8

Level of significance ∝ = 100 -95%

= 5%

= 0.05

The objective is to  develop a 95% confidence interval estimate for the proportion of all Boston residents who voted for Obama.

The confidence internal can be computed as:

=\hat p  \pm Z_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\dfrac{ p(1-p)}{n } }

where;

Z_{0.05/2} = Z_{0.025} = 1.960

SO;

=0.8  \pm 1.960 \sqrt{\dfrac{ 0.8(1-0.8)}{400 } }

=0.8  \pm 1.960 \sqrt{\dfrac{ 0.8(0.2)}{400 } }

=0.8  \pm 1.960 \sqrt{\dfrac{ 0.16}{400 } }

=0.8  \pm 1.960 \sqrt{4 \times 10^{-4}}

=0.8  \pm 1.960 \times 0.02}

=0.8  \pm 0.0392

= 0.8 - 0.0392     OR   0.8 + 0.0392  

= 0.7608    OR    0.8392

Thus; C.I =  0.7608   ≤ p ≤   0.8392

3 0
3 years ago
What is the length of BC ?
MrRa [10]
Looking at this triangle, we can see that is a form of a 45, 45, 90 triangle
This would mean that 2x-24=x-2
Solve: 2x-24=x-2
subtract x from both sides and add 24 to both sides...
x=22
6 0
3 years ago
Student performance across discussion sections: A professor who teaches a large introductory statistics class (197 students) wit
adell [148]

Answer:

The test is not significant at 5% level of significance, hence we conclude that there's no variation among the discussion sections.

Step-by-step explanation:

Assumptions:

1. The sampling from the different discussion sections was independent and random.

2. The populations are normal with means and constant variance

H_0: There's no variation among the discussion sections

H_1: There's variation among the discussion sections

\alpha =0.05

                Df     Sum Sq       Mean sq    F value     Pr(>F)

Section     7       525.01         75             1.87            0.99986

Residuals  189    7584.11        40.13

Test Statistic = F= \frac{75}{40.13} =1.87

Pr(>F) = 0.99986

Since our p-value is greater than our level of significance (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there's no significant variation among the eight discussion sections.

3 0
3 years ago
As a rule of thumb, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion can be approximated by a normal probability distribution
Gennadij [26K]

As a rule of thumb, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion can be approximated by a normal probability distribution whenever the sample size is large.

<h3>What is the Central limit theorem?</h3>
  • The Central limit theorem says that the normal probability distribution is used to approximate the sampling distribution of the sample proportions and sample means whenever the sample size is large.
  • Approximation of the distribution occurs when the sample size is greater than or equal to 30 and n(1 - p) ≥ 5.

Thus, as a rule of thumb, the sampling distribution of the sample proportions can be approximated by a normal probability distribution when the sample size is large and each element is selected independently from the same population.

Learn more about the central limit theorem here:

brainly.com/question/13652429

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Matt plans to put concrete on a rectangular portion on his driveway. The portion is 8 feet long and 4 inches high. The price of
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME REALLY QUICK
    7·2 answers
  • A man jogs at a speed of 0.96 m/s. His dog waits 2.3 s and then takes off running at a speed of 3.4 m/s to catch the man. How fa
    11·2 answers
  • What is 3x3 – 11x2 – 26x + 30 divided by x – 5?
    14·1 answer
  • A suit is on sale for $154. If the original price of the suit was $440, what percent was discounted for the sale?
    5·1 answer
  • (+3 120-130'+ 24c +8
    10·1 answer
  • 1
    8·1 answer
  • 1 mile is equivalent to 1.6 km how many kilometres is equal to 23 miles
    12·1 answer
  • In ΔRST, r = 210 inches, t = 550 inches and ∠T=166°. Find all possible values of ∠R, to the nearest degree.
    10·1 answer
  • A cab company calculates cab fares using the expression 1.50d + 3, where d is the distance traveled in miles. If a passenger has
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!