<span>True. Metaphysics focuses on what is in fact reality. It examines what it means to be in existence and how different factors work in order to compose our reality. This reality is focused on the world around us, and it is an absolute reality. This reality is separate from our thoughts or our consciousness.</span>
According to the constitution, state governments have the authority to directly control topics like the legal drinking age, marriage, divorce, and sexual activity.
A state's laws are created and implemented by its state governments, which is a separate administrative body. State governments are used by a number of contemporary nations, including the United States, Australia, and India, to administer to the local needs of an area. Modern countries grant reserved authorities, particular powers, and duties to state governments that are not granted to the federal government.
Typically, state governments are in charge of handling the particular state or region's unique demands and issues. Typically, a state constitution outlines the duties and authority of the state government. In the United States, each of the fifty states has a state constitution that outlines who has authority, how authority is distributed, how policy can be created, what rights the state's residents have, and how elections are held. Due to the fact that states typically deal with more specialized concerns, state constitutions are typically more specific than national ones.
Learn more about state governments here
brainly.com/question/22946246
#SPJ4
Dear (insert random name for the soilder),
My journey through the Pacific has been very difficult. The cold has made many of my comrades sick and weak. The Auschwitz camp is full of horrors I cannot explain. The conditions are very poor. They are given little food. Awful weather adds to our list. I really hope we make it back to our camp.
Sincerely,
(The name of the soldier)
I hope it helps
Explanation:
The railroad felt that the demand for passenger service was inelastic and opponents of the rate increase felt it was inelastic.
Inelastic demand is used in economics to give the idea that consumers buy or use same amount of the product irrespective of the increase or decrease in the price of the product.
So in this situation, the opponent wanted to say that same number of people will travel by rail no matter if the price of the tickets will increase or decrease. The passenger service will be inelastic.
So the answer is "the railroad felt that the demand for passenger service was inelastic and opponents of the rate increase felt it was inelastic".
I believe the answer is: Does the speech pose a threat to the public <span>interest?
One example of such speech would be a speech that call for a destruction of other people's house. This type of speech could either make the target of speech feel unsafe/distress, or make other people actually persuaded to destroy the house. Since both of them are breaking the law, such speech is not protected under free speech.
</span>
