Answer: It is more aggression than acquiescence. It is not a compromise between the two.
Explanation:
Answer:
$0
Explanation:
Since 100% of Cooper Corporation's stock were owned by Carole and Chris (who are siblings), then no one can recognize any loss or gain from the contribution of property (nor the distribution of property). Under section 351, no gain or loss can be recognized for the contribution of property in exchange for stocks in a controlled corporation.
Since the contribution was made through a carryover basis transaction less than 5 years before the liquidation, the distribution is carried out in the same way.
Answer:
Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
June 1 Beginning inventory 20 units at $19 = $ 380
June 7 Purchases 70 units at $20 = 1,400
June 22 Purchases 10 units at $23 = $230
Cost of goods available for sale = $2,010
On June 30, units on hand = 30 units
Cost of Ending inventory:
= (20 units × $20) + (10 units × $23)
= $400 + $230
= $630
Total cost of goods sold:
= Cost of goods available for sale - Cost of Ending inventory
= $2,010 - $630
= $1,380
Answer:
B) To maximize profit, firms should produce at a level of output where price equals average variable cost
Explanation:
Firms maximize their profit by equating Marginal revenue with The Marginal cost. So, since for perfectly competitive firms, the price equals the Marginal revenue, for these firms profit is maximized by equating Price with Marginal cost not the average variable cost.
Answer:
Abandoning the steady paycheck. ...
Sacrificing personal capital. ...
Relying on cash flow. ...
Estimating popular interest. ...
Trusting a key employee. ...
Betting on a crucial deadline. ...
Donating personal time (and health).