Yes, I agree with the researcher's method. All the values of 
in the table correspond to the values of n by using their formula.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1:
If we substitute the values of n in the researcher's equation and we get the right values of , we can agree with the researcher's method.
The researcher's formula is 
Here is the wombat population and n is the number of years.
Step 2:
When n = 1, 
when n = 2, 
when n = 3, 
when n = 4, 
when n = 5, 
As all the values correspond to the values on the table, I agree with the researcher's method.
I have to say something bc I am sleepy
Let
b-----------> the length side of the square box
h------------> the height of the box
SA---------> surface area of the box
we know that
[volume of the box]=b²*h
volume=256 in³
b²*h=256-------> h=256/b²-----> equation 1
surface area of the box=area of the base+perimeter of base*height
area of the base=b²
perimeter of the base=4*b
surface area=b²+(4*b)*h------> SA=b²+4*b*h-----> equation 2
substitute equation 1 in equation 2
SA=b²+4*b*[256/b²]-----> SA=b²+1024/b-----> SA=(b³+1024)/b
the answer is
the formula of the volume of the box is V=b²*h-----> 256=b²*h
the formula of the surface area of the box are
SA=b²+4*b*h
SA=(b³+1024)/b
Answer:
-4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
There are no solutions.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's solve your inequality step-by-step.
−7(3x−7)+21x≥50
