<h2>
Hello!</h2>
The answer is:
The correct option is:
A) $74.55
<h2>Why?</h2>
To calculate how much does Sonya pay for the four pairs altogether, we need to calculate the original price after the 50% discount and the taxes.
Calculating we have:
We have that before the tax, the price of the shoes was $17.5, then, calculating the price after the taxes, we have:
So, we have that the price after discount and the taxes is $18.637 per each pair of shoes.
Hence, the price for the four pairs of shoes will be:
Have a nice day!
9514 1404 393
Answer:
d(32) = 28.80
the price Marcus pays on an item with an original price of 32
Step-by-step explanation:
d(32) = 32 -0.1(32)
d(32) = 28.8
The problem statement tells you d(32) is the price Marcus pays when the original price is 32.
Since the Σ( of all colors )= 100%, OR 1, then:
a) P(GREEN ∪ BLUEU) = P(G) + P(BL) = 8%+6% = 14% or 0.14
Since we have to choose ONE candy and only ONE candy at random, then tey are mutually exclusive: No. Choosing a green and blue M&M is possible
b) P(YELLOW ∪ RED) = P(Y) + P(R) = 18%+18% = 36% or 0.36
SAME ANSWER AS BEFORE: mutually exclusive
c) P(NOT PURPLE), Let's calculate 1st, the probability of having a PURPLE:
P(PURPLE) = 21% or 0.21
And the Probability of NOT having a PURPLE is 1-0.21 = 0.79
Answer: B) Life in the wilderness is a constant struggle against death.
We have evidence of this by the passage (third paragraph)
<em>"On the sled, in the box, lay a third man whose toil was over, --a man whom the Wild had conquered and beaten down until he would never move nor struggle again. It is not the way of the Wild to like movement. Life is an offence to it, for life is movement; and the Wild aims always to destroy movement."</em>
It basically says that the Wild aims to destroy life just due to its destructive, cruel, and cold nature. Unfortunately the man in the box is one example of this where it appears he is dead and his two other friends are possibly carrying his body back to town with the aid of the sled dogs.
The portion "It is not the way of the Wild to like movement" is basically the same as the author saying "It is not the way of the Wild to like life" since the author states that "life is movement". In my opinion, movement isn't just simple locomotion, but it could also apply to more general types of movements that all life possesses (so you could apply this logic to plants as well in some fashion).