Answer:
$62
Step-by-step explanation:
775 times 0.08 = 62
Answer:
y = x + 1
Step-by-step explanation:
The gradient of a line can be defined by the equation:
m (gradient) = (y1 – y2 ) ÷ (x1 – x2) ----> "1" and "2" should be in subscript
For (-7,-6) we use x2 and y2 (because this point can be anywhere along a line):
x2 = -7, y2 = -6
Plug these values into the formula above:
m = (y-(-6)) ÷ (x-(-7))
m = (y+6) ÷ (x+7)
At this stage, the equation can't be solved as there are two unknowns. Therefore, the gradient must be found another way. Two lines are parallel if they have the same gradient - in their y=mx+c equations, m will be equal.
x - y=7 is the line alluded to in the question. Rearranging this equation into the line equation format gives:
y = x-7 ---> The gradient (coefficient of x) is 1.
Therefore, the gradient of the other parallel line must also be 1.
This can be substituted into the previous equation to give:
1 = (y+6)÷(x+7)
x+7 = y+6
x+1 = y
Therefore, the answer is y=x+1
The equation relating length to width
L = 3W
The inequality stating the boundaries of the perimeter
LW <= 112
When you plug in what L equals in the first equation into the second equation, you get
3W * W <= 112
evaluate
3W^2 <= 112
3W <=
W <=
cm
Answer: D
Explanation:
Since we don't know the y-value of the vertex, let's do this an easy way: plugging in.
Let's use the y intercept since that would be the easiest. Since x=0, the terms with x cancel, and you will get a leading result of -5
A) results in 2, so eliminate it
B) results in -2, so eliminate it
C) results in 5, so eliminate it
D) results in -5, so keep it
Since D was the only one that worked, that is our correct answer.
