Answer:
The answer is:
1. Acquisition cost.
2. Estimated useful life to the company.
3. Estimated residual value at the end of the asset’s useful life to the company.
Explanation:
1. Acquisition cost/Purchase price: This is the amount at which the asset(s) was bought. The acquisition cost will include the original purchase price, the cost of transporting the asset to the factory etc. and subtract any purchases discount.
2. Estimated Useful life to the company: This is the number of years the purchased asset are estimated to last for. E.g fitting and furniture with an estimated value of 5 years while the equipment for production can be 7 years. This depends on the company policy though.
3. Estimated residual value: This is the amount of money the firm is expected to get from the asset after it has been fully depreciated.
Financial counseling is the answer to your question
Add up 2,000 500 and 3100 and then divide it by 7 and you will get your answer
Answer:
$450
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Number of the units produced is 50 units
Marginal revenue is $6
Now the output increase by 50%
So, the total revenue is
= Number of units produced × marginal revenue + increased output percentage × (Number of units produced × marginal revenue)
= 50 units × $6 + 50% of $300
= $300 + $150
= $450
We simply compute by applying the above information
Answer:B. are always completely flexible
Explanation:The classical theory proposes that all markets reequilibrate because of adjustments in prices and wages which are flexible. For instance, if an excess in the labor force or products exist, the wage or price of these will adjust to absorb the excess. If prices and wages are flexible, markets reequilibrate.
Wages are said to be flexible when they respond to changes in supply and demand and lead to the market clearing wage being set. It implies that the wage will be set by the Marginal Revenue Product of labour and marginal cost of labour. Any change in supply and demand for labour will lead to a change in the wage rate.
The importance of wage flexibility arises from the fact that, in most macroeconomic models, we find an inverse relationship between wages and employment.