Answer: Your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment.
Explanation:
From the given options, we can state that the following statement is false i.e. Your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment. Our choices as a consumer tends to have a huge impact on our surroundings especially the larger social environment. Our choice affect the forces of supply and demand , and thus everything related to it.
Answer:
Amok
Explanation:
Amok is the most widely observed culture-bound syndrome, has been identified in several countries in Asia (Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand)
Culture-bound syndrome is a combination of disease symptoms that are majorly prevalent to some degree only within a specific society or culture. For example mood disorders, anorexia nervosa, hwa-byung, schizophrenia, etc
Amok disorder was first reported in Malaysia society and the disorder is characterized by sudden rage and homicidal aggression which is brought on as a result of stress, sleep depression and is usually common and prevalent among the male gender.
Answer:
case study
Explanation:
Case study is a qualitative method that usually consists of a way of deepening an individual unit. It serves to answer questions that the researcher does not have much control over the phenomenon studied.
The case study contributes to a better understanding of the individual phenomena, the organizational and political processes of society. It is a tool used to understand the form and motives that led to a particular decision.
Using the case study, Sigmund Freud developed his theory of human personality by conducting detailed interviews over a long period of time with some clients.
The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
Answer: b/c fewer people may stay at hotels
Explanation:
i’m pretty sure this is the only logical reason
