Flexible schedules in which multiple tasks are pursued at one time are <u>polychronic</u>.
Personnel with flexible schedules may not have to trip to the workplace every day. This protects their money on commuting costs, work clothing, and eating lunch out every day. Employers save money on their overhead expenses. They are able to hire a smaller office and use much less energy and water.
The monochronic subculture schedules one occasion at a time in an orderly style. Within the polychronic tradition, personnel can paint on several obligations concurrently. Polychronic people thrive on wearing out multiple ventures in an equal time so long as they may be finished together with a natural rhythm.
Polychronicity is a time period that describes individuals who opt to work on more than one sport at an equal time. Examples of polychronic behaviors encompass talking on the phone whilst riding an automobile and surfing the internet even as sitting in meetings.
Learn more about polychronic here brainly.com/question/13458867
#SPJ4
Did you mean What character doesn't try to bully Frau Holtzapfel into the air raid shelter when she refuses to go? and if you did it's Liesel and if not then my bad
An immediate cause of the Springtime of the Peoples was the revolution in France which eventually lead to a democratic government in France. This also caused discomfort in various other nations found around Europe who were inclined to gain independence for themselves.
The Ming Dynasty was established in 1368. It ruled from 1368 - 1644.
Answer:
The Constitution limits the powers of governments as one way of securing individual rights.
Explanation:
This is the statement that is true. The Constitution did not include a lot of protections when it came to individual rights, which is one reason why the Bill of Rights was later included. However, it did contain some mechanisms that ensured the protection of these rights. One of these mechanisms was the limitation of the powers of governments. By limiting these powers, the Constitution ensured that the rights of individuals were not infringed upon by governments.
