According to <span>The Gospel of Wealth, every person has to get paid the same amount of money, whereas the idea of social Darwinism is that only the strongest will survive, so, I bet the way how </span><span>the gospel of wealth justifies social darwinism is that if everyone will get paid the same amount of money, the strong person won't be able to win as everyone would be alike (reminds of basic ideas of socialism).
Hope that helps!</span>
Answer:
b. social distinctions were more blurred than in europe.
Explanation:
<u>British taxes practically caused the revolution of the colonies</u>, therefore option "A" is not the correct answer.
That various religious and ethnic groups coexisted in the American colonies was no reason for colonists to tend to support British royalty (D).<em> In fact, diversity and immigration were one of the reasons why the thirteen colonies flourished so quickly.</em>
The colonists didn´t feel that British royalty did anything for them as they had to survive on their own, dedicating themselves mainly to agriculture. <u>The difference in wealth between the inhabitants of England and the colonists was very large, therefore the colonists did not feel entitled to the rights of English citizens (C). Not because the American colonies had a great diversity of religious and ethnic groups.</u>
Because the American colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups, social distinctions were more blurred than in Europe (B). In New England, diversity was ironically the point in common that its inhabitants had and that would lead them to fight for their independence.
The first great boom in the West was spurred by: c. mining
This came from their discovery of silver and gold.
Zionism. This is where the Jewish made a national home/state.
A nuclear are said to be more child centric and more self reliant and A extended family is a social unit that includes parents , guardians,aunts , cousin.
