Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
The correct option is (D); A participant is asked to solve an easy puzzle in front of other participants.
<h3>What is social facilitation?</h3>
The tendency for the presence of others to enhance a person's performance on a task is known as social facilitation.
Some key features of social facilitation are-
- The theory of social facilitation emerged from the study of experimental social psychology as a way to explain how people behave in social settings.
- One's dominant response can be strengthened merely by being around other people, according to the definition of social facilitation.
- An individual engages in social facilitation when they successfully perform a manageable activity in front of an audience.
- Working on a difficult activity in front of a crowd may cause arousal to rise over a healthy level and impair performance.
- A beginner on a new instrument, however, could become anxious or distracted by the pressure of performing in front of an audience, and make errors they wouldn't have made during solo practice.
To know more about the difference between social facilitation and social loafing, here
brainly.com/question/46360
#SPJ4
The correct question is -
Which experimental scenario is most likely to result in social facilitation?
A. A group of participants, who initially agree on a social issue, are asked to discuss their views with each other
B. A group of participants, who initially disagree on a social issue, are asked to discuss their views with each other
C. A participant is asked to solve a complex puzzle in front of other participants
D. A participant is asked to solve an easy puzzle in front of other participants
Answer:
Localised Amnesia
Explanation:
The tragic occurrence could have many negative effects on a human being, either physical, psychological or sociological. Localized Amnesia is the most common form of failure to recall events during a circumscribed period of time. There are several other associated amnesia that may also occur to victims like Systematised amnesia, Generalised amnesia and many more. localized amnesia is a temporary memory loss restricted to specific or isolated experiences. Also called circumscribed amnesia; lacunar amnesia.
Answer:
King George did not even try to deal with the complaints the colonists had, and instead decided to let the events to transpire down. Because of the failure of positive change, the colonists started to riot, which soon led to the opening shots of the American Revolutionary War.
~
Answer:
A bad combination would be seen in a person with abnormal levels between hormones, such as high testosterone and low serotonin.
Explanation:
A person with a high level of testosterone and a low level of serotonin has a hormonal imbalance that is very harmful to the body. This happens because the hormones need to act equally, causing harmonious effects and in adequate amounts and thus promoting the proper functioning of the body.
A person with a low level of serotonin will have low energy, problems with concentration, fatigue and malaise. In contrast, high levels of testosterone can trigger high levels of energy, aggression and high mood. This contrast between the two hormones can be very dangerous for the health and behavior of the organism.
