Answer:
my life would be different as i would have to adjust my day to day life in order to workor go to school while its dark outside which can make it difficult to see. As well, it would be strange for my eyes to adjust to the sudden light change after being used to one or the other for so long. Personally I wouldnt mind the night as i love looking at the stars and moon but during the 6 months of daylight it would be hard to get some sleep.
Explanation:
Answer:
The technological component is concerned with scientific or industrial innovations.
Circle sentencing refers to the sentence/punishment that require the offender to follow a certain type of rehabilitation program so they can be educated and not repeat the same type behavior again.
Pros of circle sentencing
- the rate of re-occurrence for the same crime would be dramatically reduced.
- Since the rehabilitation program would include the combination of soft-skill and hard- skill, the offender might come out becoming a more functional member of society.
Cons of circle sentencing
- This type of programs usually cost a lot of money for the federal government. So they would most likely increase the tax rate in order to achieve this.
<span>The terms anno Domini (AD) and before Christ (BC) are used to label or number years in the Julian and Gregorian calendars. The term anno Domini is Medieval Latin and means "in the year of the Lord", but is often translated as "in the year of our Lord"
</span>
A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
