Answer:
3.37%
Explanation:
M = 100l/R.
M = 100 x $254,000 / $7,548,000 = 3.3651...
Rounding to the nearest hundredth, we get the net profit margin is 3.37%.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Property risk is an example of a pure risk.
Pure risks are risks in which loss is the only possible outcome. It could be full loss or partial loss. Other examples of pure risks are personal and liability risks
Property risk is the risk that a person or company's property would be damaged or lost.
For example, if a building is set on fire or if a car is stolen
Answer:
Answer is adaptive.
Refer below for the explanation.
Explanation:
Therefore,
Aiden tells Harry that, "The heart of Bergman’s would still be intact. All Priya is proposing here really is taking the idea of self-checkout a couple steps further…" Based on this statement, Aiden most likely believes automation represents adaptive change.
Adaptive means to modify or become adjusted to new situations.
Answer:
(1) NO As this maintenaince will be done in order to keep the current value It is an expenditure to avoid decay of the plant assets
(2) Yes it should be capitalizeds as increase the useful life of the assets (thus the depreciation will change as well as the useful years remaining increases
(3) Yes it should be. As increase the utility it will have a higher future positive cashflow in the future.
Explanation:
We are asked under which circumnstances the amont spend in the maintenance or overhaul should increase the plant asset account or be considered expense of the period.
Answer:
D. Has not committed an unethical act since the loan was documented in writing.
Explanation:
Section 102 of the Uniform Securities Act of 1956 specifies that it is unlawful and unethical for an investment adviser representative to enter into a contract with a client except it is provided in writing that he does not stand to gain any financial profit, that no assignment of the contract would be made without the consent of the other party, and that if there is any change in the membership of the contract, the other party would be notified.
So, if the contract was documented between the investment adviser and the client, then it would not be unethical conduct.
