Almost positive the answer would be <span>concept that people may decide what agreements they want to enter into</span>
It would give me the impression that you’re not interested in the interview. If someone walked into an interview while doing the above personally I would see them as “having better things to do”
Anyways, Hope this somehow helps!
Answer:
d. If Cazden's stock price rose by $5, the exercise value of the options with $25 strike price would also increase by $5.
Explanation:
A call option confers a right, not an obligation upon the call buyer to buy a security at a pre determined price, known as exercise price or strike price at a future date.
A call buyer would exercise his right only in the scenarios wherein the strike price is lesser than the current market price on maturity.
Profit of a call buyer is given by = CMP as on expiry - Exercise/Strike price - Option premium paid
wherein CMP= Current Market Price
A call option is "in the money" when it's strike price is less than it's current market price. In the given case, it means if the CMP today represents CMP upon expiry, call buyer would exercise his right and his gain would be $5 i.e $30 - $25.
Since the $25 exercise option is "in the money", an increase in stock price by $5 will also increase the strike price by $5.
Answer:
a. Suppose that if you receive the stock bonus, you are free to trade it. Which form of the bonus should you choose? What is its value?
I would choose the stock bonus because the current market price = 200 x $64 = $12,800 which is much higher than $4,600 (cash bonus)
b. Suppose that if you receive the stock bonus, you are required to hold it for at least one year. What can you say about the value of the stock bonus now? What will your decision depend on?
Even if you are required to hold the stock for one year, the price difference with the cash bonus is too great = ($12,800 - $4,600) / $4,600 = 178% higher. Since you are employed by the company, you should know if the company is doing well or not, and the probable future stock price.
Only if something catastrophic happened to the company would make the cash bonus more attractive.
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
The construction company is entitled to compensation because it has a property right to enter and remove minerals.
The investor gave the construction company the right to use the properties on the land, if anything would be done on the land, the construction company should be compensated because they bought the right to do business there. Since the owner granted them the sole right, they are entitled to the resources.
