1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inessss [21]
3 years ago
13

How was separation of powers achieved in the new constitution

History
1 answer:
juin [17]3 years ago
6 0
The Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the government were assigned clear and limited roles under the Constitution
You might be interested in
List 2 arguments in support of the use of strikes
liq [111]
Union strikes help management reevaluate salary rates and with negotiation and compromise, both management and employees can agree on a suitable and fair wage rates
5 0
3 years ago
What experience did Roosevelt have that might hep his position as President?​
bezimeni [28]

Answer:

When he was governor of New York, he started a broad relief program is the correct answer.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The Marshall Plan and the creation of NATO both...
Rama09 [41]

Answer:

D. Created a strong alliance between the US and Western European countries.

Explanation:

The Marshall Plan was a way for the US to provide aid to Western Europe in 1948 after the conclusion of WW2. WW2 left Europe in ruins, while the US, due to its geopolitical location, was left relatively unscathed on its home front. Through this plan, the US was ultimately able to provide billions of dollars in aid to Western Europe.

On the other hand, NATO stands for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and it was a mutual defense pact formed by the US and its allies. NATO included the US, Canada, and 10 Western European countries. With NATO, these countries essentially pledged to defend each other under attack and to collectively work towards their mutual safety and security.

Therefore, both NATO and the Marshall Plan strengthened the US's ties to Western Europe, making the answer D correct.

<u>We can also analyze the other answer choices to see why they're incorrect:</u>

Option A is incorrect because the Marshall Plan has nothing to do with the Korean War, it was simply a way to provide aid to Europe. Moreover, the Korean War was primarily between North Korea and South Korea, as a proxy war during the Cold War. Not all NATO countries were involved, and the US wasn't defending their own security, rather they were fighting Communism in Asia.

Option B is incorrect because the Marshall Plan provided huge sums of economic aid that only made rebuilding Europe easier.

Option C is incorrect because NATO only increased tensions. Not only did NATO mean that the US could station weapons in its member states (meaning weapons in closer proximity to the Soviet Union's territory) but it also made tensions impossible to deny. The Soviet Union and its allies would respond in 1955 with their own pact known as the Warsaw Treaty Organization.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following quotes best reflects the principle of limited government in the Declaration of Independence? "For deprivi
UkoKoshka [18]

I believe the answer is: All men… are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happines



The key phrase is : <em>endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights</em>


Unalienable rights indicate the rights that could never be override by anyone, including the people who had the highest power in the country.

This mean that when governments are making their legislation and programs, they should not cross the unalienable rights which are held by the citizens. This will restrict government power.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 3 more answers
Which was not a reason for us intervention in Latin america during the cold war era
horsena [70]

Answer:

4## the fall of the Soviet Union

Explanation:

The Cold War period is a period in which the US and the USSR had lot of tensions, threatening, competition in pretty much everything. This period lasted until the fall of the Soviet Union at the beginning of the 1990's, thus we can not say that that was a reason for US intervention in Latin America during the Cold War as after the fall of the Soviet Union there was no more Cold War.

The US have a long history of interventions and meddling in Latin America, and it is hard to find a nation in which they haven't intervened, sponsored certain groups, or at least tried to do some of that. That has resulted in lot of despise toward the US in Latin America among the ordinary people, as the majority of their interventions were ending up with military conflicts and cracked economies, setting up dictators as leaders of these nations as well.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • John Locke wrote that, according to social contract, every person is entitled to the natural rights of life, liberty, and estate
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following events is not associated with Al Qaeda?
    12·2 answers
  • Why were women able to find new job opportunities during World War II?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did cabot not settle on newfoundland
    8·1 answer
  • Which Chinese dynasty invented the compass, gunpowder, paper money, and movable type?
    5·2 answers
  • Explain how the absolutist governments of Europe were different
    9·1 answer
  • What was the impact of the British empire in New Zealand? ​
    7·2 answers
  • What was Washingtons attitude toward the government?
    9·1 answer
  • Please help asap!
    5·1 answer
  • How did Thomas Aquinas attempt to explain the differences between Aristotle and the Church's teachings? (Site 1)
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!