Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
They use a <span>Straight Piecework Plan </span>as an incentive to their employees.
The Straight Piece-Work System is the simplest incentive approach in which the rate in keeping with unit of output is fixed, and the income of the employee are computed with the aid of multiplying his total output by rate per unit. We can also define this as the system or plan in which the employers or workers are paid according to the number of units produced during a defined time period at fixed rate.
