Answer:$75.04
Step-by-step explanation:
last year price=$67
12% of 67
12/100 x 67
(12 x 67) ➗ 100
804 ➗ 100=8.04
Since it has risen by 12%
There new price is 67+8.04=75.04
I think it is 8,4 let me now if it is right
<2= 30 degrees since its vertical to the 4th angle.
<1=150 degrees
<3=150 degrees
since angle 3 and the 4th angle are supplementary, which means both angles equal 180 degrees, angle 3 equals 150 degrees.
since angle 3 is vertical to angle 1 it's also 150 degrees since they're congruent.
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
The minimum is at the vertex (- 3, 1 ), that is y = 1
Since the graph is a minimum then it opens vertically up U
The range of the values of y are therefore
range [ 1, ∞ )
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Both expressions are examples of the <em>distributive property</em>, which basically says "if I have <em>this </em>many groups of some size and <em>that</em> many groups of the same size, I've got <em>this </em>+ <em>that</em> groups of that size altogether."
To give an example, if I've got <em>3 groups of 5 </em>and <em>2 groups of 5</em>, I've got 3 + 2 = <em>5 groups of 5 </em>in total. I've attached a visual from Math with Bad Drawings to illustrate this idea.
Mathematically, we'd capture that last example with the equation
. We can also read that in reverse: 3 + 2 groups of 5 is the same as adding together 3 groups of 5 and 2 groups of 5; both directions get us 8 groups of 5. We can use this fact to rewrite the first expression like this:
.
This idea extends to subtraction too: If we have 3 groups of 4 and we take away 1 group of 4, we'd expect to be left with 3 - 1 = 2 groups of 4, or in symbols:
. When we start with two numbers like 15 and 10, our first question should be if we can split them up into groups of the same size. Obviously, you could make 15 groups of 1 and 10 groups of 1, but 15 is also the same as <em>3 groups of 5</em> and 10 is the same as <em>2 groups of 5</em>. Using the distributive property, we could write this as
, so we can say that
.