Answer: 
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Since the calculated value of t =-0.427 does not fall in the critical region so we accept H0 and conclude that there is enough evidence to show that mean difference in the age of onset of symptoms and age of diagnosis is 25 months .
Step-by-step explanation:
The given data is
Difference d= -24 -12 -55 -15 -30 -60 -14 -21 -48 -12 -25 -53 -61 -69 -80
∑ d= -579
∑d²= 29871
1) Let the hypotheses be
H0: ud= 25 against the claim Ha: ud ≠25
H0 : mean difference in the age of onset of symptoms and age of diagnosis is 25 months .
Ha: mean difference in the age of onset of symptoms and age of diagnosis is not 25 months.
2) The degrees of freedom = n-1= 15-1= 14
3) The significance level is 0.05
4) The test statistic is
t= d`/sd/√n
The critical region is ║t║≤ t (0.025,14) = ±2.145
d`= ∑di/n= -579/15= -38.6
Sd= 23.178 (using calculators)
Therefore
t= d`/ sd/√n
t= -38.6/ 23.178√15
t= -1.655/3.872= -0.427
5) Since the calculated value of t =-0.427 does not fall in the critical region so we accept H0 and conclude that there is enough evidence to show that mean difference in the age of onset of symptoms and age of diagnosis is 25 months .
Could be wrong but since given the smaller quadrilateral is similar to to larger one, by definition the ratio of there corresponding sides would be congruent. Length of 5 of ec is to 10 of bc as the length of fe (6) is to the length of ab would be 12
