1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
djverab [1.8K]
4 years ago
10

Michael Johnson devised a framework that involves putting acts of violence into a broader pattern within the relationship. His w

ork identified three principle patterns: Group of answer choices
Social Studies
1 answer:
Bumek [7]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

You question did not include options, but I have provided the option in the 'ask for details' box.

The correct answer is (b) common couple violence, intimate terrorism, and violent resistance

Explanation:

Michael Paul Johnson born December 20, 1942 an emeritus professor of sociology. His work categorized three principle patterns of violence which are common couple violence, intimate terrorism, and violent resistance.

You might be interested in
How did roosevelt try to convince congress to declare war on japan
chubhunter [2.5K]

Roosevelt was able to convince Congress to declare war on Japan by convincing them of the need to retaliate for Japan's actions at Pearl Harbor.

<h3>What did Japan do at Pearl Harbor?</h3>

In December 1941, the Japanese Navy attacked Pearl Harbor in Hawaii and killed thousands of people.

As a result of this clear provocation, Roosevelt asked Congress to declare war on Japan to avenge the violation of U.S. territorial integrity.

Find out more on the Pearl Harbor attack at brainly.com/question/860420.

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Do the benefits of raising the minimum wage outweigh the drawbacks?
mina [271]
This seems to be an opinion based question, I will provide you with both a yes and no response with arguments to support it and you can choose which one best suites your beliefs:

Yes, the benefits of raising the minimum wage outweigh the drawbacks.  By raising the minimum wage you increase the quality of life for workers.  Many full time workers are unable to afford housing or groceries in this economy on the minimum wage.  At $7.25/hour and 40hrs/week is $290 before taxes.  This is not enough income to cover the basic costs of living in most places.  If people earned more money they would have more money to spend and corporations would profit from an increase in sales.  Also, workers wouldn't have to depend so much on government services such as food stamps and section 8 housing assistance because they would be able to support their families with their own income.  This would free up funds for government to provide more for the school systems, better healthcare and/or infrastructure.

No, the benefits of an increased minimum wage would not outweigh the drawbacks.  The drawbacks of a higher minimum wage are significant because they most directly effect small business owners.  The "mom and pop shop" owners depend on paying low salaries in order to keep their doors open.  If they were forced to increase their pay rates, by what many minimum wage supporters suggest: more than double, they would not be able to afford employees to keep their doors open.  Also, government agencies would be forced to pay their low-level workers as much as $15/hr which could become a tax burden on the citizens who pay for the salaries of all government employees. Raising the minimum wage would be detrimental to the economy because small companies and the government could not afford to support the salaries and benefits of their workers.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1925: Gitlow v. New York
egoroff_w [7]
The answer is letter C. The incomparable court's fuse of the bill of rights on a case-by-case premise and the expansion of the bill of rights to the states through specific joining.

I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more here in brainly. 
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Imagine a large majority of people in your state wanted to eliminate all taxes, even if that meant that the government could no
melisa1 [442]

Answer:

If she agrees with the tax elimination, she is carrying the voice of a majority group,  in this case, those who are in favor. She is acting in a delegate role. So the correct word to fill the blank is delegate.

Explanation:

She is the delegate because she is speaking on behalf of a group of persons with a specific request and in addition to this, she is in favor.

7 0
3 years ago
Please help me with this​
liraira [26]

no:

why? because its not in proper format

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which doctrine binds courts of equal or lesser levels within a jurisdiction to the principles established by higher appellate co
    13·1 answer
  • Your driving privileges may be affected in Georgia by your use of the following substances:
    6·1 answer
  • The period in which rhythmic notation first appeared in western music, and concepts of formal structure, such as proportion, tex
    7·1 answer
  • 5 Different groups of people that lived in North American in the 1760's
    7·2 answers
  • Subsidized dayaccording to jeff chambers, applicants with the _________ don’t fit with sas’s collaborative culture.care and free
    13·1 answer
  • Which is the best example of the seniority rule?
    7·1 answer
  • What kind of institutions started accepting girls in the late 1780s?
    5·2 answers
  • La antigua Mesopotamia estaba ubicada en
    15·2 answers
  • Hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes on-the-job training?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!