The correct answer is A) Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?
The other options of the question are B) Who pay for this research and what possible motivations would they have to skew the results in a way that would benefit them? C) What are the average mortality rates associated with diabetes and does this risk offset the benefits of sitting comfortably at work? D) How did the researchers measure how many hours the subject sits per day and what qualifies as an official diabetes diagnosis?
A new high-profile study reports a strong connection between how long people sit every day and how likely they are to develop diabetes. The question that best represents a critical examination of the research is " Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?"
A critical examination is the kind of evaluation approach that uses a systemathic and logical way to understand the phenomenon at study. The issue is studied in a systematic way to analyze the content and the variables in order to find the best alternative for the solution. That is why the question "A" best represents critical examination.
Answer:
c. industries in the West based on available natural resources
Explanation:
The West have sizable quantities of ore and forests, and are used when available and needed. However, this is not too say that rely solely on these two for their economy, but is still a part of it.
~
The financial status of a nation is the "heart" of itself..
1. Good financial status means no depression
2. No depression means no job losses
3. Stronger military, more spending room
Https://quizlet.com/4452507/ch-22-flash-cards/ Here is the answer. Its down a little ways on the list but I think it could help.
Answer: I believe it is True. Anyone correct me if I am wrong!
