1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elis [28]
3 years ago
11

I got a riddle for all of you

Mathematics
2 answers:
netineya [11]3 years ago
8 0
Are we supposed to answer this? The answer would be thirteen (13)
Leno4ka [110]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

16 is a multiple of 4. 13, 15, and 17 are not multiples of 2.

You might be interested in
Is the ordered pair (0, 4) a solution of the inequality y≤x−3? Explain.
Andrew [12]

The ordered pair (0,4) does not satisfy the inequality thus, it will be not the solution to the given inequality.

<h3>What is inequality?</h3>

A mathematical phrase in which the sides are not equal is referred to as being unequal. In essence, a comparison of any two values reveals whether one is less than, larger than, or equal to the value on the opposite side of the equation.

As per the given inequality,

y ≤ x - 3

Put x = 0

y ≤ 0 - 3

y ≤ -3

Since 4 ≤ -3 is the wrong statement thus it will not satisfy the inequality.

Hence "The ordered pair (0,4) does not satisfy the inequality thus, it will be not the solution to the given inequality".

For more about inequality,

brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
you are using division to determine how much whole wheat flour to use in a bread recipe.is an estimated answer good enough? plea
Pavel [41]
Yes, it is. if you end up getting 4.85239854285696357835482938339158989............................... you wouldn't want to measure out exactly that much.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can anybody help? I do not understand:(
Dvinal [7]
Six now have a good day happy face bye-bye
7 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me solve and simplify this??
Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

The Answer is -x + 3.

Step-by-step explanation:

It's honestly one of the longest process'. Above is the right answer though. Hope it helped.

7 0
3 years ago
Simplify the expression 8(2x - 6y + 3) using the distributive property. *
yawa3891 [41]

Answer:

16x - 48y +24

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use the distributive property to expand:

  1. 8(2x - 6y + 3)
  2. 8 x 2x - 8 x 6y + 8 x 3
  3. 16x - 48y + 24

Hope this helps!!

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Could u tell me what 60:48 in its simplest form is please
    10·1 answer
  • The function, f(t) = 100.000 describes the number of people who will become infected with a virus in t weeks. Approximately how
    9·1 answer
  • What's the answer to this question
    14·1 answer
  • The answers and work to all please quick
    5·1 answer
  • Which expression does not belong with the other three? Explain your reasoning. 8 = x —2 3 = x ÷ 4 x − 6 = 5 x —3 = 9
    10·1 answer
  • I have 14 tens, 6 hundred, 7 tens /thousands, and 15 ones
    15·1 answer
  • Ethan writes
    6·2 answers
  • Do y’all know the answer to this!?
    8·1 answer
  • nick received a 5% commission on his total sales. Last week his sales totaled $2,500. How much did nick earn in commission last
    6·1 answer
  • When the cpi is 185, an electric razor cost $57.81. what is the difference between the price of an electric razor in 1983 and th
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!