Answer:
I don't know how to answer to this at all but We Must bring more awareness to this.
In "What Made Me Do What I Did", Kaneko Fumiko is a socially cognizant individual that doesn't generally have confidence in development in light of purge words, and endeavors to discover significance in life through whatever it is that she chooses to do as opposed to the aftereffect of what she does. All through the story, she runs from being sad with an antagonistic point of view and society to turning into an exceptionally energetic individual, in spite of the fact that without a genuine objective. She never had a decent association with her folks who surrendered and later repudiated her. The aftereffect of her association with her folks drove her to have her skeptical and communist convictions. The dropping out of her sentimental association with Segawa was what prompted her to wind up more free in the wake of understanding that he was not genuine of the relationship nor a capable individual. Meeting Hyeon made her more impassive about being isolated from individuals after he cleared out her in a circuitous manner. Her association with Hatsuyo, which was depicted as the nearest she had been to another lady, made her more determined and energetic about her perspectives on society. It is additionally what persuaded that it was smarter to discover importance in what she does instead of the outcomes. Meeting Pak Yeol was the start she expected to at last understand her objective of beginning her own development for the advantage of the abused and what made her a rebel.
People began to domesticate animals and crops...
and as their tools became better they were able to grow crops and livestock
Answer:
1) This situation is out of the standard set by Tarasoff decision’s duty to protect because the situation is severe and Dr. Yeung should not rely on probability. This could be possible that Aiden was trying to threaten Dr. Yeung and demanding no interference in his personal life. Dr. Yeung is a health psychologist but as a psychologist, she could understand the seriousness of the situation so she must call the professional support. Dr. Yeung should refer this case to the clinical psychologist and provide support to them about the health and behavior conditions.
2) Ethically, Dr. Yeung’s decision may affect the research purpose but morally her decision may help a person who needs it. The decision of Dr. Yeung was exceptional so it must be considered as an exceptional condition.
3) Dr. Yeung should consult the clinical psychologist and psychiatrists before handling this type of case. Dr. Yeung was not assigned to handle abnormal behavior problems and therapies, she could have handled the situation as an exceptional condition and with the help of team support.
4) Dr. Yeung should consider this case as health and abnormal behavior problem rather than a general condition. The behavior of Aiden was destructive and it should be analyzed with the help of security agencies, medical practitioner, psychologist and psychiatric. Dr. Yeung tried to done her job well but her lack of experience could have threaten her and patient’s life. I think, Dr. Yeung should demand professional help and experienced services.
Answer:
Mainly responsible for the conduct of ballot at the polling station