The first question’s answer is the last option. And the range is 104
Answer:
<u><em>The Father is currently 47 and the Son is 7</em></u>
Step-by-step explanation:
Let F and S be the present ages of Father and Son, respectively.
We are told that <u>(F-2) = 9(S-2)</u> [2 years ago, father age was nine times the son age]
We also learn that <u>(F+3) = 5(S+3)</u> [3 years later it will be 5 times only]
Take the first expression and isolate one of the variables (S or F). I'll isolate F:
(F-2) = 9(S-2)
F = 9S - 16
Now use this in the second expression:
(F+3) = 5(S+3)
((9S-16)+3) = 5(S+3)
9S-13 = 5S+15
4S = 28
S = 7
Since F = 9S-16,
F = 9*(7)-16
F = 47
<u><em>Father is 47 and Son is 7</em></u>
CHECK:
Was the father 9 times the age of his son 2 years ago?
Father would have been 45 and son 5. Yes, 9*5 = 45
In 3 years will he be 5 times older than his son? Yes, Father would be 50 and son would be 10. 5*(10) = 50
Answer:
qwertyuasdfghjk
Step-by-step explanation:
ashkdsbvnxz egufwoD;vbjxz> n
1,076 (the original thickness) - 22.7 meters (loss per year) * 7 (lost 22.7 meters per year for seven years, so multiply the loss per year by the amount of years) = 917.1 (the size after 7 years)
A.K.A 1,076 - 22.7 * 7 = 917.1
i found this off of the internet so im sorry if its wrong
Answer:
The cost of 5 hours of skiing would be the same ($125) after 5 hours.
Step-by-step explanation:
Black Diamond: ChargeBD(h) = $50 + ($15/hr)h, where h is the number of hours spent skiing.
Bunny Hill: ChargeBH(h) = $75 + ($10/hr)h
We equate these two formulas to determine when the cost of using the ski slopes is the same:
ChargeBD(h) = $50 + ($15/hr)h = ChargeBH(h) = $75 + ($10/hr)h
We must now solve for h, the number of hours spent skiing:
50 + 15h = 75 + 10h
Grouping like terms, we obtain:
5h = 25, and so h = 5 hours.
The cost of 5 hours of skiing would be the same ($125) after 5 hours.
