The roots of the Orthodox Church are in Catholicism.
Answer: C) Should give Claudio the answer because the answer to such a question does not entail giving legal advice
Explanation: Having a middle name or several middle names is quite common and legal, but also not having a middle name is legal. This means that when filling out form a, depending on the state, one can, for example, put the initials N.M.N. (no middle name) or similar. Also, if there is one, the middle name can be indicated in the name by initials. All of this, when filling out the form, you may also ask the salter clerk or anyone who knows this information reliably and not the legal, though if you are in the situation you may as well.
Legal advice as such is given solely by a lawyer, and it concerns important matters when careful analysis of regulations and the law as a whole is needed. No careful analysis is required to fill in a form without a middle name, it is simple to know whether to enter a middle name and what to do if one does not have a middle name. This is simply known by clerk who work on a daily basis to receive completed forms.
A test subject i think but idk
Answer:
"Research Bias"
Explanation:
Based on what is described in the question we can say that Dale's study is vulnerable to "Research Bias". This is when an experiments results are influenced by the researcher that is conducting the experiment. Since Dale is being biased and reacting friendlier towards the female participants he may accidentally be favoring the results gathered from the female participants.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The correct answer is inductive and deductive logic
Logic studies the syllogism or argument. It has its own forms capable of showing that a conclusion is derived from what was established in the premises or propositions given previously. There are two ways of proceeding when you want to form an argument, they are:
The syllogism or deductive argument is one that proceeds from increasingly universal propositions to particular propositions, providing what we call a demonstration, since its inference (the conclusion is drawn from the premises) is the inclusion of a less extensive term in a larger one extension.
The second type of argument is inductive. This comes from particular propositions or with terms relatively smaller than those in the conclusion, and comes to more universal or more extensive terms.
