Answer:
C
Explanation:
Cost=10000
Accumulated depreciation=3000
Sales price=9000
Net value=10000-3000=7000
Gain=9000-7000=2000
Answer:
a. Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $8,500 and keep polluting
Explanation:
The fishermen sell the fish for $8,000 a year at local market.
Due to pollution emitted by company into stream, their catch is dwindling and also their income.
The company benefits from usage of stream to the tune of $4,000 a year. In such scenario, if company compensates the fishermen for any amount between $8,000 and $40,000 then, in that case, optimal solution to the problem can be achieved in absence of any other transaction cost as per the Coase Theorem.
Therefore, The Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $8,500 and keep polluting.
Answer:
A. 1/3 computers
B. 0.6 computers
Explanation:
A. The opportunity cost incurred by the US to make cars is the number of computers it would have to give up to make a car.
The US can either make 12 cars or 4 computers. For every car made therefore the US forgoes;
= 4/12
= 1/3 computers.
B. The same logic applies to Japan. They can either make 10 cars or 6 computers.
Their opportunity cost for cars is therefore;
= 6/10
= 0.6 computers
<span>Compared with many European countries the party in government system in the united states is less differentiated. (have a lesser amount)
In many European countries, the parties that involved within the government could account to more than 4 parties. Meanwhile, there are only 2 major political parties in the United States, Democratic party and the republican party</span>
Answer: Im not doing the math but Option 2 is the better option
Explanation:
