Answer:
no
Explanation:
I do not believe that the adversarial system is the best method to solve disputes. The adversarial system encourages the trier of fact (the judge or jury) to side definitively with one party, when, in many cases, the truth lies somewhere in the middle of the parties. In addition, the adversarial system encourages inequality in justice, as the parties that can afford the best legal services often win.
Answer:
<u>possibly</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. <em>In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.</em>
Answer:
D.traffic lights
Explanation:Their whole point is to tell you what to do i.e. when to go, when to slow down, and when to stop they cannot distract you because they are telling you what to do.
Answer: There are 2 session