Answer:
The answer is B and D!!
Explanation:
A is what u use to measure liquids,C. is for weighing.
Expert thought is sometimes described as: Intuitive
<h3>What do intuitive thoughts imply?</h3>
Intuitive thinking entails acting on one's gut instincts and making quick decisions based on automatic cognitive processes. Reflective thinking involves questioning first instincts and considering alternative options, allowing for counterintuitive decisions.
Researchers have proposed four types of intuitive thinking, each distinct and unique but easily identifiable in most situations:
- Intuitive emotional thinking
- Psychic intuitive reasoning
- Spiritual intuitive reasoning
While intuitive thinking is an important part of problem solving, it can lead to errors in fact-based situations. People who think intuitively are less efficient decision makers and frequently suffer from cognitive biases.
Using your intuition has several advantages, including: One of the most significant benefits of intuition is that it allows you to make quick and effective decisions in complex and unfamiliar situations.
To know more about Intuitive thinking refer:
brainly.com/question/12450483
#SPJ4
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The media are businesses whose main objective is profit maximization. It is also true that they are required by law to care for certain ethical standards but, in general, they show the contents that will attract a larger audience. They do not care on whether these contents can be giving visibility to candidates whose political proposals are bad for the welfare of citizens. I got this from someone.
Answer:
A). Was replaced by someone who is below the age of 40.
Explanation:
Prima Facie Case of discrimination(Title VII, Civil Rights Act, 1964) is elucidated as the case in which the petitioner possesses adequate evidence to validate his complaint or allegation and prove that he/she has been discriminated against by their employer. To make such a case, the plaintiff is required to present sufficient evidence to prove to the judge or convince him/her to deduce that the discrimination from the employer's end took place.
As per the question, to make a 'Prima facie case' against the employer Milford is required to not let disclosed or established that he 'was replaced by someone who is below the age of 40' as this would influence the credibility of his allegation and make the judge infer a decision against him(due to the age factor). Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
