If you won a prize of $5oo you may decide on several things to do with this money;
- You could save it.
- Buy a clothing item
- Buy your favorite game.
- Visit a park with a friend
<h3>What is a scholarship contest?</h3>
This is a contest that is usually between eligible people who are seeking for paid sponsorships for their education.
Winning this money would go a long way for a student who would use the money on a range of activities and goods that they love.
Read more on scholarships here:
brainly.com/question/25298192
#SPJ1
Answer:This argument is consistent with: conflict theory.
Explanation:
Conflict theory: is a theory that states that the dysfunction of society is due to categorising people into groups based on their status and this is harmful to society because it creates inequality whilst the rich keep getting richer and better treatment in the expense of the poor.
It focuses on how resources are unequally distributed, the abuse of power by those who hold prestigious positions , and inequality which is due to status differences based on who has more money or based on race and other factors. Those who have power and resources in the society are able to use them to influence how they get treated and rule over those who have less. There is a competition in resources according to the conflict theory and some seem to extract more resources for just themselves .
Answer:
Explanation:
The modern technology and western customs allowed India to become a burgeoning regional superpower. The colonization of India was helpful for India because it went a long way to modernize India, westernized India in government and equality, and allowed India to be a successful country it is today.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
because that particular person wants to start his/her own business with the small capital startup
Donald P. Green and David H. Yoon, 2002 "Reconciling Individual and Aggregate Evidence Concerning Partisan Stability:
<h3><u>Applying Time-Series Models to Panel Survey Data</u></h3>
Abstract.
- Party identification has been studied extensively using both individual- and aggregate-level data. This paper attempts to formulate a statistical model that can account for the range of empirical generalizations that have emerged from aggregate time series and panel surveys. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we show that only certain types of data generation processes can account for these empirical regularities. Deciding which of the remaining types best explains the data means investigating the ways in which individual-level partisanship behaves over time.
- Partisanship at the aggregate-level tends to be highly autocorrelated, re-equilibrating slowly in the wake of each perturbation. Working downward from the analysis of aggregate data, previous researchers argued that aggregate partisanship is fractionally integrated and contended that dynamics at the individual level are therefore heterogeneous. Using data from three panel surveys, we present the first direct assessment of individual-level dynamics. We also investigate the hypothesis that these dynamics vary among individuals, a claim that motivates much recent work on fractionally integrated time series.
- The model that best explains the observed characteristics of party identification is one in which individuals respond in similar ways to external shocks, re-equilibrate rapidly thereafter, and seldom change their equilibrium level of partisan attachment.
To know more about time series models ,check the links.
brainly.com/question/14299073
brainly.com/question/15114845
#SPJ4
