1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hatshy [7]
3 years ago
9

In which two ways does the modern US political system differ from that of ancient Rome?

History
2 answers:
Serhud [2]3 years ago
6 0
A and E are the correct answers.  Later D comes into play.  This depends upon what time period in Rome.  
amm18123 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A. The government functioned as a single body of law in ancient Rome and E. ancient roman male citizens were required to serve in the military is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The people of Ancient Rome established the republic after overthrowing the last Etruscan king while the American people founded the republic after the American Revolution. Both Americans and Romans set up a government which is ruled by the people and for the people and both the systems are republic.

In republic, the head of the government is elected by the people and they elect their representatives for making laws. There are both similarities and dissimilarities between the ancient Roman republic and the government of US, both of them have executive and legislative branches in their government along with set of checks and balances. The head of the executive was the head of the military in both the governments, Executive also had the veto power and both governments had written laws.

<u><em>The differences</em></u> were that the Roman republic didn’t had a separate Judicial branch and the Rome was run by more than one consuls while the US has only one president. There was a provision for the dictator to take over the government in emergency situations but there is no such concept in US. The consuls also had religious duties while there it isn’t so in US. The slave labor was used In Roman republic while slavery has been outlawed in US. The Roman senators served for life while US senators serve only for six years. Roman women were not allowed to participate in government while they can do so in US. The roman social class was rigid in nature while the US social class  is flexible.

You might be interested in
Why did the government create permanent armies?
avanturin [10]

Answer:

Territory

Explanation:

They helped control more territory

3 0
1 year ago
What territory was the site of numerous Spanish missions but was severely depopulated in the 17th century by infectious disease
Anit [1.1K]
The Mocama province

<span>The Mocama Province was faced by a number of challenges that led to a sharp decline in its population. It was first plagued by a an infectious disease.In addition, there were series of war between the Spanish colonialists and the English crown forces in the North. Remnant refugees from the province were resettled at st. Augustine.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the social contract theory how do leaders gain the right to rule
jok3333 [9.3K]

By the consent of the people over whom they rule.

The "social contract" refers to an implicit agreement between a government and the citizens of the society overseen by that government.   Philosophers of the Enlightenment era were famous for arguing the idea of a "social contract."  According to this view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed.  This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler.  One of the most influential of the social contract theorists was John Locke, who repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government.</em>  In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government</em>,  Locke then argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting and enhancing their own life, liberty, and property.  

6 0
3 years ago
What was the “Solid South”? When did the South stop being the “Solid South”?
Kobotan [32]
The solid south was an electoral voting blog of southern us. Im not sure about the answer to the next question I hope I helped
8 0
3 years ago
How was a yooman different from a planter?​
yuradex [85]

Answer:

Planters: owned slaves, and lots of land was owned. Yeomen: had maybe 1-2 slaves, barely any land was owned.

Explanation:

hope this helped

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did President HW Bush send troops during his presidency?
    9·2 answers
  • A tenant farmer rents the land on which he or she grows crops. Please select the best answer from the choices provided.
    13·1 answer
  • Help meeeeee please pretty pleas
    7·1 answer
  • What is good cause attributable to the failure of socialism and communism wherever they have been attempted throughout the world
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes American agriculture in the 1950’s?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the policy of appeasement pursued by France and Britain during the 1930s?
    8·1 answer
  • What defined the two emerging political parties during this time?
    8·1 answer
  • Post classical Europe crossword clue
    12·1 answer
  • The Allied forces brought an end to the war in Europe by
    11·1 answer
  • Which features of the Edwards Plateau make the area best suited for grazing
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!