1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
3 years ago
10

Write an expression for the verbal phrase:

Mathematics
2 answers:
Slav-nsk [51]3 years ago
4 0
Expression: 

2 * x = 15

Hope that helped!

AlladinOne [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: 15 / 2x

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi, the answer to this question is 15 / 2x.

Quotient means the division of two numbers, In this case 15 is mentioned first, so it is the dividend and the expression "2x" is the divisor.

Product means multiply one number or variable by another. In this case, is 2 multiplied by x.

So, the final expression is:

15 / 2x.

Feel free to ask for more if it´s necessary or if you did not understand something

You might be interested in
Helpp plz i'll mark brainliest (see picture). <br> The second part is, What is the value of y?
Art [367]

Answer:

116*

Step-by-step explanation:

36* + 28* = 64*

180* - 64* = 116*

4 0
3 years ago
Find a recursive formula for the sequence:<br><br> 1, -1, -7, -25
Mumz [18]
<h3>Answer:</h3>

a_n=3a_{n-1}-4

<h3>Step-by-step explanation:</h3>

<em>Try the answers</em>

You can try the answers to see what works. You can expect all of the choices to match the first two terms, so try some farther down. Let's see if we can get -25 from -7.

a) 3*(-7) -4 = -21 -4 = -25 . . . . this one works

b) -7 -2 = -9 . . . . ≠ -25

c) -3(-7) +2 = 21 +2 = 23 . . . . ≠ -25

d) -2(-7) +1 = 14 +1 = 15 . . . . ≠ -25

The formula that works is the first one.

_____

<em>Derive it</em>

All these formulas depend on the previous term only, so we can write equations that show the required relationships. Let the unknown coefficients in our recursion formula be p and q, as in ...

a_n=p\cdot a_{n-1}+q

Then, to get the second term from the first, we have

... 1·p +q = -1

And to get the third term from the second, we have

... -1·p +q = -7

Subtracting the second equation from the first gives ...

... 2p = 6

... p = 3 . . . . . . . this is sufficient to identify the first answer as correct

We can find q from the first equation.

... q = -1 -p = -1 -3 = -4

So, our recursion relation is ...

a_n=3a_{n-1}-4

6 0
3 years ago
A surveyor standing at A notices two posts B and C on the opposite side of a canal. The posts are 120m apart. If the angle of si
AveGali [126]

Unfortunately there isn't enough information.

Check out the diagram below. We have segment BC equal to 120 meters long. Points B, C, D and E are all on the edge of the same circle. According to the inscribed angle theorem, angles BDC and BEC are congruent. This shows that the surveyor could be at points D or E, or the surveyor could be anywhere on the circle. There are infinitely many locations for the surveyor to be at, which leads to infinitely many possible widths of this canal.

5 0
3 years ago
VXYZ is a kite. What is the length of XY?
olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

5x - 6 = 3x + 4 \\ 5x - 3x = 4 + 6 \\ 2x = 10 \\ x = 10  \div2 \\ x = 5 \\ length \: of \: xy = 3 \times 5 + 4 \\  = 15 + 4 \\  = 19

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the largest clinical trial ever​ conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group consis
BARSIC [14]

Answer:

The requirements for the hypothesis test does satisfied the method for testing the claim that from two population proportions the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine.

Step-by-step explanation:

The percentage of children in the treatment group was:

(201229/401974)*100 = 49.9%

The percentage of children given placebo was:

(200745/401974)*100 = 50.1%

The percentage of children that developed polio in the treatment group:

(33/200745)*100 = 0.0164%

The percentage of children that developed polio in the placebo group:

(115/201229)*100 = 0.0571%

The percentage difference between the two group:

((0.0571-0.0164)/0.0571) = 61.62%

Therefore:

The amount of children used for each group was almost divided into half of the total amount of children. The test revealed although very small percentages of the both group developed polio, 68.62% more children given placebo than the children that was given the salk vaccine. Therefore, the study shows that the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine and the the hypthesis test is satisfied.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which best describes the range of the function f(x)=2/3(6)^x after it's been reflected over the x-axis
    15·1 answer
  • Simplify completely ((x2-4x+4)/(x2+10x+25)) x ((x+5)/(x2+3x-10)) ...?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the factorization of 121b^4-49
    7·1 answer
  • How do I complete the square?
    14·1 answer
  • If there are 200 pencils in a case and 75 are sharpened, what percentage of pencils are not sharpened
    12·1 answer
  • A 12 ft ladder is placed 5 feet from a building. Approximately how high does the ladder reach? Round to the nearest tenth, if ne
    5·1 answer
  • I need help with this math 50 points if you get is right
    11·1 answer
  • NO LINKS!!! PLEASE HELP ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    8·2 answers
  • I still dont understand how they got 50
    5·2 answers
  • Neika is saving her money to buy a DVD that costs $45. If she has a job that pays $8 per hour, write and solve an inequality tha
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!