All categories

3 years ago

Discuss one factor that may cause teenagers to engage in risky behaviour

Social Studies

2 answers:

Bezzdna [24]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

peer pressure.

Explanation:

their peers can influence them to do something others are doing and cause teens to engage in risky acts.

irina1246 [14]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The way they were raised.

Explanation:

if they have too much discipline, they could do things just to go against their parents. It can also be if they dont have enough. there is a fine line.

You might be interested in

1. According to the principle of comparative advantage Charles Woodson plays defensive back rather than receiver for the Green B

barxatty [35]

According to the principle of comparative advantage Charles Woodson plays defensive back rather than receiver for the Green Bay Packers because his advantage as a defensive back exceeds his advantage as a receiver.

Option: B

Explanation:

The theory of comparative advantage depicts how a country can produce more goods instead of utilizing less services. In this way advantage of produced goods will be more in comparison with utilized services. When the profit margin exceeds used cost ratio it establish comparative advantage theory.

It is mainly effective in international trade and commerce where many goods are being imported and exported and taxes are collected on the basis of profit margin. Richardo establishes the theory of comparative advantage.

4 0

3 years ago

Why did Prince Henry the Navigator want to send ships south to Africa?

Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

Prince Henry had several reasons for dispatching his expeditions. This is because he was interested in finding the christian allies as well as gold.

Hope this helps!

7 0

2 years ago

Pls help i really need it

Harlamova29_29 [7]

Explanation:

6 Benefits of NAFTA

1. Quadrupled Trade.

2. Lowered Prices.

3. Increased Economic Growth.

4. Created Jobs.

5. Increased Foreign Direct Investment.

6. Reduced Government Spending.

USMCA.

Quadrupled Trade

Between 1993 and 2019, trade between the three members quadrupled from $290 billion to $1.23 trillion.5 6 That boosted economic growth, profits, and jobs for all three countries.7 It also lowered prices for consumers.

. Lowered Prices

Lower tariffs also reduced import prices. That lessened the risk of inflation and allowed the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates low.

Increased Economic Growth

NAFTA boosted U.S. economic growth by as much as 0.5% a year.18 The sectors that benefited the most were agriculture, automobiles, and services.

Created Jobs

Some sources say that NAFTA exports created 5 million net new U.S. jobs.27 Most of those jobs went to 17 states, but all states saw some increases. U.S. manufacturers added more than 800,000 jobs between 1993 and 1997. Manufacturers exported $487 billion in 2014. It generated $40,000 in export revenue for each factory worker.

Increased Foreign Direct Investment

Since NAFTA was enacted, U.S. foreign direct investment (FDI) in Canada and Mexico has more than tripled to $500.9 billion. In 2017, U.S. investors poured $391.2 billion into Canada and $109.7 billion into Mexico.2524 That boosted profits for U.S. businesses by giving them more opportunities to develop and markets to explore.

Reduced Government Spending

NAFTA allowed firms in member countries to bid on all government contracts.29 That created a level-playing field for all companies within the agreement's borders. It cut government budget deficits by allowing more competition and lower-cost bids.

USMCA

Despite these advantages, the United States, Mexico, and Canada renegotiated NAFTA on Nov. 30, 2018.30 The new deal is called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. (USMCA) Mexico ratified the agreement in 2019. The agreement was signed by Donald Trump on Jan. 29, 2020. Canada's Parliament ratified it on Mar. 13, 2020.

4 0

3 years ago

Which supreme court case set a precedent that allowed the courts to apply a balancing test in free speech cases?

marishachu [46]

It was Schenck v United States

4 0

3 years ago

3. What did President William Howard Taft mean when he wrote that "the President can exercise no power which cannot be fairly re

Simora [160]

Answer:

Explanation:

What did President William Howard Taft mean when he wrote that "the President can exercise no power which cannot be fairly reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justly implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise"? How does this compare with President Theodore Roosevelt’s argument? Compare their arguments.Which position comes closest to the experience of the modern presidency? (Please note that this is about the institution of the presidency in modern experience, not about an individual president). Which position do you prefer?

The president can express no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justifiably implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise. Such specific grant must be either in the federal constitution or in an act of congress passed in pursuance thereof

3 0

3 years ago