Answer:
Two of the exclusive responsibilities of the states in the United States are providing for public safety, health, welfare and regulating intrastate commerce.
Explanation:
The United States has a federal system where many of the day-to-day governing functions are under the jurisdiction of the individual states and the federal government has only certain exclusive powers like naturalization and declaring war. Exclusive powers are those powers that are reserved to either the federal government or to the individual states themselves, they are not powers they share. Concurrent powers are powers shared by the federal government and the states. Both the states and the federal government have the power to tax the citizens and to make laws as concurrent powers. Both the federal and state governments can also charter banks or borrow money.
Answer: a. role strain.
Explanation:
ROLE STRAIN is a phenomenon that occurs when one is having difficulty meeting the responsibilities of a SPECIFIC role in their life which in this case is that of a student.
The student is required to study hard as well as perform volunteer work as a student meaning the responsibilities might conflict under the SPECIFIC role of student.
This is different from ROLE CONFLICT where MULTIPLE roles conflict each other such as an employee student having the job's responsibilities conflicting with the responsibilities required of a student.
The Texan Rangers were the regulators in the texan border. Regulators were Texas rangers who patrolled the streets terrorising Mexicans and hunting down American-Indian livestock rustlers. When Texas required independence from Mexico in order to operate alone as a republic, the regulators and rangers came to power.
Charles W. Jackson and Charles W. Moorman were the main Regulators commanders, and their main objective was to stop cattle rustling. But when the Regulators' acts grew out of control, a rival vigilante organisation known as the Moderators was established to "moderate" the Regulators.
To learn more Texas refer
brainly.com/question/20737446
#SPJ4
Immanuel kant claims that the only thing that is moral without qualification is <u>"good will".</u>
Kant depicts a “good will” as the main thing that is moral without qualification. “Good will” is to act with moral thinking, regardless of what the result of the activity. It is constantly planned on great and therefore does not have to meet all requirements to be great, as it is in all examples "great". Joy is accomplished by acquiring an end, and in this way it is of no ethical esteem, where as the “good will” is downright and accordingly moral.
Answer: True
Explanation:
In Kyllo v. United States (2001), a 5-4 opinion was delivered by Justice Antonin Scalia in which the Court held that the Government used a device that is not in public use, to explore details of the home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion hence the surveillance is a 'search' and is unreasonable without a warrant.