The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>
Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.
Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.
Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106
#SPJ1
She can type 4,800 words in one hour.
Answer:
12m
Step-by-step explanation
If the height of the ball after x seconds be modelled by the equation
h(x)=−(x−2)² +16
The height of the ball at the time it is thrown will be the height at the initial time. At that point that it is initially thrown the time is 0seconds i.e x = 0
To get the height at t x = 0seconds, we will substitute x = 0 into the modeled function to have;
h(0) = -(-0-2)²+16.
h(0) = -(-2)²+16
h(0) = -4+16
h(0) = 12
The height of the ball at the time the ball is thrown is 12m
1+3+5+7+...+999 =
= 1+2+3+4+...+500
+1+2+3+...+499
= 2·(1+2+3+...+499) + 500
= 2·(499·500)/2 + 500
= 499·500 + 500
= 500·(499 + 1)
= 500·500
= 250.000
