Answer and explanation:
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.
- <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>
In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.
- <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>
<em />
The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.
He didnt think the US should tie themselves to any European power.
issues could come about if England wanted to get involved in any territories.
if they sided with one Britian it Would be directly hypocritical of their practice and staement about being free from European affairs being seperate entities.it would go against their statement of being independent from foreign affairs
Pan Africanism was opposed to outside
political interference and colonization of Africa. It advocated for
independence and self-reliance of African states that would independently
provide for their citizenry. Proponents of the ideology were opposed to external political and economic
involvement on the continent.
From the information I know at this time i believe it is C.
hope this helps
