Yes, I think that identifying the purpose would increase the credibility of the source, so if we understand the "should" here as "would be good if, is recommended" - then this statement is true.
Including the intent of the information in the source will help place the information in a wider context - and often the context is necessary to fully understand the content of a source.
Answer:
c. Is less puzzling when the reinforcers maintaining it are known.
Explanation:
In the given scenario, the bizarre behavior of John is discussed, mainly about his professional life as a boxer. His injuries from such regular fights do not seem to hinder or reduce his involvement in fights.
At the same time, he also knows the risks that his fighting brings, that he can get serious brain damage or even permanent injuries. But that doesn't seem to have much impact on him for he continues to fight. This is an example of bizarre behavior that is less puzzling when the reinforcers maintaining the bizarre behavior are known.
Thus, the correct answer is option c.
They are the Rejected children. They somebody who is unequivocally loathed by his associates. "Rejected children" are one of the five sorts of sociometric statuses, a framework for classifying a kid's social standing in view of associate reactions to that tyke. A few companions may like a "rejected children" to a degree, yet the tyke is only very seldom distinguished as anybody's closest companion.
Answer:
I believe your answer is Argentina and Chile.