That's actually really hard to determine, but given the scope of families today, I think it would be D. <span>Two or more people related by blood, marriage, or adoption
</span>
The answer to this question is: Conclusion
In legal terms , conclusion refers to the things that are really vital to reach a statement during a hearing.
Since the judge will make his/her decision based on the answers of the defendants, it safe to assume that every potential answer could be considered as such.
Southern whites had held black people in slavery for many years. Now, the former slaves were getting to enjoy a small taste of freedom. Also, the South had started the Civil War which had caused so much death and destruction. It was not surprising that the North showed little sympathy when the fighting stopped and the South lay in ruins.
The bigger one will travel further bc it will gain more velocity causing it to roll faster and go further
Answer:
Likely due to confounding.
Explanation:
This outcome can most likely be explained as a consequence of confounding. Confounding refers to a distortion in the measure of association between two variables. This inaccuracy is the consequence of the variable of interest being mixed up with another factor that played a role in the result. In this example, this means that there might be another variable at play that causes this association between eating fruits and vegetables and the risk of developing colon cancer.