1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mars1129 [50]
3 years ago
7

84.

Law
1 answer:
natali 33 [55]3 years ago
8 0
B police officer I believe not sure
You might be interested in
Ok raise of hands who wants trump who wants biden and who belives in equaltiy
ahrayia [7]
Hi there. i believe in equality

thanks for the points and have a wonderful day :)
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
HELPPPP ME PLEASEEEEE
Stells [14]

Hi!!!

Answer: jenny did it because she told her how big of a foot she has while she was shopping for some new sandals.

Hope this helps have a wonderful day!

6 0
3 years ago
When drinking alcohol, which part of the body first begins to absorb the drug into the bloodstream?
Drupady [299]

Answer: 20% goes into the bloodstream and then the rest goes to the Stomach and Small Intestine as well as the Liver.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is an allen charge? when is it applied
allsm [11]

Answer:

After deliberation, a jury reports that it is deadlocked and unable to decide on a verdict.

Explanation:

used when jurors cant decide on a verdict,  and dislodge jurors from entrenched positions

-example Allen v US 164 U.S 492 (1896)

hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 7. When driving, being appropriately dressed for the current weather environment is also very important to the task of driving.
    15·2 answers
  • How the Bill of Rights is supposed to protect defendants from situations like the Scottsboro boys case. What has happened betwee
    14·1 answer
  • *****
    8·2 answers
  • Which term describes a formal statement naming the plaintiff and the defendant and describing the nature of a civil lawsuit?
    6·2 answers
  • A large online credit card hack involving multiple financial institutions resulted in the loss of billions of dollars. Which typ
    7·2 answers
  • Help please- I’ll luv you forever
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following individual is NOT considered a U.S. citizen?
    12·1 answer
  • In lucy v. zehmer, the two parties were drinking in a bar when lucy offered to buy zehmer's farm.
    13·1 answer
  • हेर्दैमा सुन्दर एवम् विशाल
    14·1 answer
  • You'll have to do a little research for this assignment. Nebraska has a unicameral, or one-house, legislature. It is the only st
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!