Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
Answer:
I think its C but i dont know
Explanation:yea
Answer:
No. Unless they do not peacefully stand with what the petition.
Explanation:
Taking the BLM petiton for example, the petition was made for peace and equality, and that's what the owner of the petition intended.
There were people who took advantage of this protest and turned it into a way for burgulary and started stealing under the circumstances that there was a peaceful protest.
Answer:
because, the court believes the issue is political rather than legal and should be handled by state and national government.
Explanation:
A republican form of government is one in which the political authority that is operational comes from the people. As seen in the United States of America, power is given to the government of the area by the citizens through its elected representatives. This is visibly spelt out in the constitution of the country and the third president of the U.S, Thomas Jefferson, asked the colonists at that time to move away from monarchy and become republican citizens themselves.
The supreme court of the country decided not to get involved in the definition of the term “republican form of government” because they rightly see the issue to be political in nature rather than legal and they expect the state and national government to handle it.
Yes ,Because it means that if you go to a private school, you are not covered by the same laws as you were when you attended public school. Private schools are covered by something called contract law. It means that schools have the right, and obligation, to act as legal guardians for students to ensure their wellbeing.Jul 14, 2019
